THAILAND
24
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
tests were conducted in baht, as banks are not required to report their foreign exchange positions
unless they have a significant FX position and Thai banks have limited exposure to FX currencies.
11. The results suggest that banks are resilient to large withdrawals of funding, despite
their front-loaded funding maturity structure (Figure 12). Three banks fall below the hurdle rate
of 100
percent in the severe scenario, of which one falls below the Basel III transitional threshold of
80 percent. The aggregate liquidity shortfall of 0.7 percent of total assets (1.5 percent of GDP). The
results of the cash-flow-based analysis were broadly consistent with the LCR test over a one-month
horizon. All but two banks have a positive funding over all the time horizons.
Two banks would have
a negative cash flow over the “180 days and beyond” window (with small shortfall of 6 and 7 percent
respectively, of each bank’s total assets). It is key to enhance the data management for liquidity risk
to ensure the availability of more granular data, including on a detailed balance-sheet
decomposition by maturity. A simplified liquidity stress test of SFIs suggests that all three SFIs have
sufficient liquidity to withstand an 11 percent decline in deposits
over a five-day period, but more
granular data is also needed to refine this exercise.
Figure 12. Thailand: Liquidity Stress Test Results
The aggregate LCR under the severe scenario falls to
104 percent.
The counterbalancing capacity is used in the “1–7 day”
window, and “more than 180 days window,” due to the
large proportion of sight deposits and other liabilities.
The aggregate LCR under the severe scenario, which combines the shocks to retail, wholesale and investment funds’
deposits, remains above the hurdle rate of 100 percent.
Source: SEC and IMF staff estimates.
1
Liquidity shortfall is the amount required so that the liquidity ratio in each bank in the system be equal to or
above 100 percent; the ratio effective as of June 2018.
Note: The analysis of the impact of IFs deposit withdrawal partially took into account the feedback effects between
commercial banks, investment funds, and the financial market.
LCR
LCR
LCR
LCR
LCR
Standard
Severe
Retail
Wholesale
Investment Funds
5DSIBs + 3IRBs LCR ratio (percent)
188
104
138
139
174
Liquidity shortfall
1
THB billion
…
248
24.7
53.7
0
Percent of GDP
…
1.5
0.2
0.3
0.0
Percent of banks' assets in sample
…
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.0
Number of banks faling
to meet
the regulatory rate
…
1 out of 8
0 out of 8
0 out of 8
0 out of 8
to meet the hurdle rate
…
3 out of 8
2 out of 8
2 out of 8
0 out of 8
0
50
100
150
200
250
LCR standard
LCR
severe
scenario
LCR retail shock
LCR wholesale
shock
LCR investment
funds shock
5 DSIBs
3 IRBs
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: