The methodology of linguistics sherbutayeva maxsuda


Download 1.25 Mb.
Sana28.02.2023
Hajmi1.25 Mb.
#1236803
Bog'liq
THE METHODOLOGY OF LINGUISTICS SHERBUTAYEVA

THE METHODOLOGY OF LINGUISTICS

SHERBUTAYEVA MAXSUDA

What are the common methodologies in language research?

  • There are four different research methodologies that can be used by students in conducting a research in language studies, they are i) experimental research, ii) quasi or pre-experimental research, iii) ethnography, iv) case study.

What is the role of methodology in the language system?

  • Methodology is a system of practices and procedures that a teacher uses to teach. It will be based on beliefs about the nature of language, and how it is learnt (known as 'Approach').

What are the 4 methods of teaching?

  • There are different types of teaching methods that can be categorized into four broad types.
  • Teacher-centered methods,
  • Learner-centered methods,
  • Content-focused methods; and.
  • Interactive/participative methods.

Synchronous formal descriptive method

  • From the 40s of the XX century to the present day it is a method of depiction, which is reflected in the modern Uzbek educational linguistics Its roots go back to the Moscow (formal) linguistic school (great representatives Philip Fortunatov, Alexei Shakhmatov, Alexei Peshkovsky, Viktor Vinogradov), which was formed in the late XIX and early XX centuries. Turkic scholars Nikolai Dmitriev, Nikolai Baskakov, Yevgeny Polivanov, Alexander Borovkov, Andrey Kononov introduced this method to our science.

Leading representatives of this research method in Uzbek linguistics are Ayyub Gulomov, Zokir Marupov, Fakhri Kamolov, Sobirjon Ibrahimov, Ganijon Abdurahmonov, Mazluma Askarova, Mustaqim Mirzayev, Fattoh Abdullayev, Shonazar Shoabdurahmonov, Azimjon Hojiyev, many of them number of students and followers.

  • Leading representatives of this research method in Uzbek linguistics are Ayyub Gulomov, Zokir Marupov, Fakhri Kamolov, Sobirjon Ibrahimov, Ganijon Abdurahmonov, Mazluma Askarova, Mustaqim Mirzayev, Fattoh Abdullayev, Shonazar Shoabdurahmonov, Azimjon Hojiyev, many of them number of students and followers.

The main principles of this method are:

  • - approach to language as a social phenomenon,
  • - joint description of language and speech phenomena without differentiation,
  • - description of the static state of the language in a certain period,
  • - Philosophically understood form (material external, external sign, form) - such as the form of a word or suffix, the pronunciation of sounds - in general, based on the aspects of language units that affect the sensory organs, their formal, spiritual and description of functional features, systematization of events obtained as a result of observation.

Comparative comparison descriptive method

  • It is known from the history of linguistics that the development of this science is true of the ancient Hindus, Greco-Roman and Arabs, who legalized (sanctified, divine) works (the works of Homer in Greece, the Vedas in India, the Koran in Islamic countries). - is associated with reading in a form that requires a religious habit. This required identifying and describing differences in dialectal speech on the one hand, and comparing other peoples and their own (religious) languages with normative spelling and pronunciation on the one hand. After the adoption of this religion by other nations, these peoples had the task of popularizing the basics of religion in their native languages. This, in turn, required the comparison of the language of these peoples with their (religious) languages, the creation of dictionaries and manuals. In the ancient Indians V – IV BC, in the Greeks e. o. This is the reason for the development of the comparative-descriptive method in the IV-I, VIII-IX centuries AD in the Arabs.

Turkic scholars such as Mahmud Kashgari, Mahmud Zamahshari, Abu Hayyan, Ibn Muhanna, who were educated in the achievements and traditions of Arabic linguistics, also used this method of analysis in their works, and on this basis gave descriptions of Turkic languages.

  • Turkic scholars such as Mahmud Kashgari, Mahmud Zamahshari, Abu Hayyan, Ibn Muhanna, who were educated in the achievements and traditions of Arabic linguistics, also used this method of analysis in their works, and on this basis gave descriptions of Turkic languages.
  • The comparative method was also the leading method of research in Iranian and Mongol studies, which was formed and developed in the X-X1Y centuries within the framework of Arabic (Islamic) linguistics.

HOMEWORK

Find an alternative to the highlighted words based on the substitution method

(snynonyms)

  • My little sister is beautiful girl.
  • This house is very big.
  • 3. She smiles at her mother

Find an alternative to the highlighted words based on the substitution method Antonyms

  • This bag is black
  • The box carrying the roof was heavy
  • The hill we saw was high

Download 1.25 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling