Environmental performance of the innovative, patented mixing system in an agricultural biogas plant based on lca approach
Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways
Download 4.03 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
1-s2.0-S0959652622010423-main
Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. J. Clean. Prod. 24, 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.030 . Poland, Statistics, 2022. Swine Population as of December 2021 (access on 07.03.2022, in Polish). https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo/produkcja- zwierzeca-zwierzeta-gospodarskie/poglowie-swin-wedlug-stanu-w-grudniu-2021- roku,7,14.html . Risberg, K., Cederlund, H., Pell, M., Arthurson, V., Schnürer, A., 2017. Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure–Chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity. Waste Manag. 61, 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.016 . Saracevic, E., Koch, D., Stuermer, B., Mihalyi, B., Miltner, A., Friedl, A., 2019. Economic and global warming potential assessment of flexible power generation with biogas plants. Sustainability 11 (9), 2530 . Singh, B., Szamosi, Z., Simenfalvi, Z., 2020. Impact of mixing intensity and duration on biogas production in an anaerobic digester. J. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 4, 508–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1731413 . Thorin, E., Nordlander, E., Lindmark, J., Dahlquist, E., Yan, J., Bel-Fdhila, R., 2012. Modelling of the biogas production process—a review. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Energy ICAE, Suzhou, China, 5–8 July. Paper ID: ICAE2012- A10732 . Timonen, K., Sinkko, T., Luostarinen, S., Tampio, E., Joensuu, K., 2019. LCA of anaerobic digestion: emission allocation for energy and digestate. J. Clean. Prod. 235, 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.085 . Van Stappen, F., Mathot, M., Decruyenaere, V., 2016. Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant. J. Environ. Manag. 175, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.020 . Voytovych, I., Malovanyy, M., Zhuk, V., Mukha, O., 2020. Facilities and problems of processing organic wastes by family type biogas plants in Ukraine. J. Water Land Dev. 45 (IV–VI), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2020.133493 . Vu, T.K.V., Vu, D.Q., Jensen, L.S., Sommer, S.G., Bruun, S., 2015. Life cycle assessment of biogas production in small-scale household digesters in Vietnam. AJAS (Asian- Australas. J. Anim. Sci.) 28, 716–729. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0683 . Wagner, M., Manhold, A., Lask, J., 2019. Economic and environmental performance of miscanthus cultivated on marginal land for biogas production. GCB Bioenergy 11, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12567 . Weiland, P., 2009. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 85, 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 . Wrzesi´nska-Jędrusiak, E., Klimek, K., Najda, A., Łaska-Zieja, B., Olesienkiewicz, A., 2020a. Study on the potential of biogas production from herbal residues. Chem. Ind. 99, 224–227. https://doi.org/10.15199/62.2020.2.7 . Wrzesi´nska-Jędrusiak, E., Łaska-Zieja, B., Herkowiak, M., Myczko, A., Klimek, K., 2020b. Analysis of pig slurry as a substrate for monosubstrate biogas plant. Chem. Ind. 99 (11), 1557–1676. https://doi.org/10.15199/62.2020.11.12 . Zhao, Y., Wu, J., Yuan, X., Zhu, W., Wang, X., Cheng, X., Cui, Z., 2017. The effect of mixing intensity on the performance and microbial dynamics of a single vertical reactor integrating acidogenic and methanogenic phases in lignocellulosic biomass digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 238, 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biortech.2017.04.080 . E. Wrzesi´nska-Jędrusiak et al. Download 4.03 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling