Functional-semantic characteristics of deictic units in english and uzbek

CONCLUSION
The research showed that the lexical semantic and functional features of the English and Uzbek languages are expressed in all the main layers of the language and in the text. Let's compare semantic strings of color:
In Uzbek: havorang → blue → blue → blue → dark blue-turquoise. In English: arctic → skyt/teal/cerulean/sapphire → cobatl → azure/admiral → blue/navy.
It can be seen that although there are five members in the semantic line in Uzbek and five members in English, there are more variants of the blue color that are very close to each other, but differ only in their application to objects. That is, the first term is expressed by two words, the second term by four words, and the fifth term by two words. In conclusion, it should be noted that the semantic lines of the blue color in the English language, created through the synonyms and cognates (thesaurus) given only in dictionaries, differ from the semantic line of the blue color in the Uzbek language in the aspects analyzed above.
LIST OF REFERENCES:
1. Abduazizov A. (2010). An Introduction to Linguistic Theory. Tashkent: East.
2. Bazarov O. (1997). Grading in Uzbek. Phil. science. doc. dis. autoref.
(p. 16). Tashkent.
3. Boldyrev N.N. (2001). Cognitive semantics (65 p.) Tambov.
4. Djumbabayeva J.Sh. (2007). Lexical and stylistic graduonomy in different system languages. Monograph (126 p.). Tashkent.
5. Gak V.G. (1971). Semantic structure words. Moscow: Nauka.
6. Hajiyev A. (1966). Auxiliary verbs in the Uzbek language (188 p.). Tashkent.
7. Kibrik A.A. (1994). Cognitivnye issledovaniya po discourse. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya, 5.
8. Kolshansky G.V. (1965). Logic and structural language (pp. 51-62). Moscow: Nauka