O‘zmu xabarlari вестник нууз acta nuuz

O‘zMU xabarlari Вестник НУУз ACTA NUUz
 
FILOLOGIYA 
1/5 2023 
- 274 -
components of conceptology will be described further - a 
picture of the world and, in particular, the conceptual picture 
of the world. 
Kubryakova defines cognitive linguistics as “a 
linguistic direction that focuses on language as a general 
cognitive mechanism, as a cognitive tool - a system of signs 
that play a role in the representation (coding) and 
transformation of information” [12]. 
There is another approach. Scientists V.I. Karasik and 
I.A. Sternin consider cognitive linguistics to be an 
independent field of modern linguistic science, which emerged 
from cognitive science. “At the same time, the difference 
between cognitive linguistics and other cognitive sciences lies 
precisely in its material - it explores consciousness on the 
material of language (other cognitive sciences explore 
consciousness on their own material), as well as in its methods 
- it explores concepts and cognitive processes, draws 
conclusions about types and the content of concepts in the 
human mind…” [7]. 
The goal of cognitive linguistics according to V.A. 
Maslova - "to understand how the processes of perception, 
categorization, classification and understanding of the world 
are carried out, how knowledge is accumulated, what systems 
provide various types of activities with information" [12]. 
Modern cognitive linguistics is aimed at modeling the 
picture of the world and the structure of the linguistic 
consciousness of a person who knows and feels. 
It is language, according to Maslova, that provides 
natural access to consciousness and thought processes, not 
only because many results of mental activity turn out to be 
verbalized, but because “we know about the structures of 
consciousness only thanks to the language that allows us to 
communicate about these structures and describe them in any 
natural language” [3]. 
The mechanism of artistic and figurative use of a word 
and a term in artistic speech does not have a fundamental 
difference. Differentiation lies in the traditional character of 
the expressed image of the word and the individuality of the 
expressed image of the term. But if in the scientific style 
terminological vocabulary is the main element and performs 
only a nominative function, then in artistic speech the term is 
used in a nominative-descriptive and artistic-figurative 
function - in order to recreate the production coloring, labor 
activity of the characters, and create the speech characteristics 
of the characters. In the latter case, it loses the features 
inherent in special vocabulary, and acquires all the features 
characteristic of commonly used words. “Terminological 
vocabulary, 
by 
definition, 
is 
decoded 
correctly, 
unambiguously and accurately, but only in texts of a scientific 
functional style. A special text creates a so-called "terminal 
field", which unambiguously semantizes the terminological 
vocabulary and acts as a guarantor of consistency and 
accuracy. Getting into the text of another functional style, the 
term can despecialize, losing signs of systemicity, and the 
degree and direction of despecialization depend on the type of 
text that accepts terminological vocabulary” [1]. The study of 
stylistic functioning, the study of the expressive stylistic 
function outside the scientific text allowed S.V. Lobanov to 
discover the evaluative potential of a scientific term in literary 
discourse [2] and to determine that the use of terminological 
vocabulary in an evaluative function in a literary text goes 
beyond marking objects only by the opposition “positive / 
negative”. “The stylistic functioning of the terminological 
vocabulary marks the objects of evaluation, the subject of 
speech, the social and etiquette side and the relationship of the