O‘zmu xabarlari вестник нууз acta nuuz

O‘zMU xabarlari Вестник НУУз ACTA NUUz
 
FILOLOGIYA 
1/5 2023 
- 275 -
a particular individual . With all this, any new information 
acquired as a result of the development of all public 
institutions becomes part of a changing conceptual system” [4: 
3]. 
The concept was formed as a result of the study by 
literary scholars of certain mental categories belonging to a 
single consciousness. The study of the concept concept allows 
us to understand the features and patterns of the author's 
thinking, as well as the mechanisms for interpreting the 
individual author's concept of the world. Particularly 
important in the research was "the study of the artistic thinking 
of writers and poets who create a different reality in their 
works" [5: 195]. 
Recently, special attention has been paid to the science 
of concepts. Conceptology is a new, developing science, so 
there are many questions around the subjects of its study, 
goals, as well as the concepts with which it correlates, in 
particular, about the concept. 
This term was borrowed by linguists from 
mathematical logic and found its application after the 
appearance of the work of S. A. Askoldov-Alekseev "Word 
and Concept", published in the journal "Russian speech". That 
part of the linguistic sign, which F. de Saussure called the 
signified, was traditionally defined in Russian-language 
studies as a “concept”. This term was used in works on 
linguistics until the 70s of the twentieth century, but in some 
works the term "concept" was also used. 
However, the term was not in demand, perhaps due to 
inconsistency with the Russian language and the more familiar 
"concept", so the "concept" disappears from use. And only a 
few decades later, the term is again in demand by cognitivists 
studying the basic subsystems of human consciousness. 
The term "concept" in the 70s of the twentieth century 
began to be used again by linguists in connection with the 
appearance of translated works on semiotics and linguistics by 
a number of Western, mainly English-speaking, authors [3]. In 
some cases, the English word "concept" was translated as 
"concept", in others - as "concept" (Frumkina 1992: 80). 
At the beginning of the XX century, the term gained 
popularity thanks to the works of D.S. Likhachev and Yu.S. 
Stepanov, who endowed it with an independent interpretation. 
The use of the term has become necessary to describe 
cognitive objects aimed at an associative figurative 
assessment. 
It should be noted that all the above approaches to the 
definition of the concept of discourse do not contradict each 
other, but complement and give this phenomenon the status of 
an object of interdisciplinary study. T. Milevskaya in this 
regard indicates that the idea of the processes of generation 
and understanding of the text is impossible without relying on 
the communicative situation. The opinion of the researcher 
seems to be one of the most convincing. Following T. 
Milevskaya, in this work, discourse is understood as a set of 
verbal and cogitative actions of communicants associated with 
the cognition, comprehension and presentation of the world by 
the speaker and comprehension, reconstruction of the 
linguistic picture of the world of the producer by the recipient. 
Such a representation is in line with the dynamic (on-line) 
approach to the language; key deverbatives (action, cognition, 
presentation, reconstruction) quite fully reflect the variety of 
operations of the highest degree of complexity performed by 
communication participants [2]. 
It should be noted that the relationship between the 
concepts of "discourse", "text" and "speech" is a long-standing 
subject of scientific discussions. The opposition “written 
text/oral discourse” reduces concepts to two forms of 
linguistic reality [Galperin 1981; Hoey 1983; Turaeva 1986]. 
However, the supporters of such a distinction themselves note 
its “inadequacy” [11]. 
Before 
turning 
to 
the 
issue 
of 
conceptual 
representation, we would like to consider processes such as 
categorization and conceptualization and identify their 
differences, consider the categories of values proposed by 
researchers (Karasik, Serebrennikova), and move on to ways 
of representing these values in discourse.