O‘zmu xabarlari вестник нууз acta nuuz


Download 1.91 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet86/211
Sana08.05.2023
Hajmi1.91 Mb.
#1443249
1   ...   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   ...   211
Bog'liq
NEMIS VA O‘ZBEK TILLARIDA UY HAYVONLARI NOMI BILAN SHAKLLANGAN DENGIZ HAYVONLARI

Conclusion. The world around us is dynamic, but all 
objects of reality are in their place, whether they are similar to 
each other or different - and this is the main meaning of 
natural categorization. So we can classify our knowledge 
about the world and the experience gained, bring everything 
collected into a system of categories and use it in our minds. 
The objects involved in categorization are similar or different 
in their physical and functional characteristics, which is 
reflected in the semantics of the language units that we use to 
describe these objects. In other words, since childhood, we 
have a property to categorize objects of reality according to 
their similarity or difference. 
A person not only observes and categorizes objects, 
but also uses them for his mental work, involves them in his 
mental and physical operations. In the interaction of a person 
with objects of reality, he can influence them, and they have 
the opportunity to influence a person. Thus, a person may 
have a subjective / individual assessment of an event
phenomenon or object of reality, and in the future he can 
define it into a system of categories according to a certain 
scale of assessment. This is how evaluative categorization 
works. 
REFERENCES 
1. Alefirenko N.F. Controversial problems of semantics: monograph / N.F. Alefirenko. – M.: Gnosis, 2005 
2. Arutyunova N.D. Language and the human world / N.D. Arutyunov. – M.: Yaz. Russian culture, 1999 
3. Babushkin A.P. Types of concepts in the lexico-phraseological semantics of the language, their personal and national 
specificity: author. diss ... d. philol. Sciences. - Voronezh, 1998 
4. Belyaevskaya E.G. The semantic structure of the word in the nominative and communicative aspects (Cognitive bases for 
the formation and functioning of the semantic structure of the word): dis. ... Dr. Philol. Sciences. - M., 1992. 
5. Benveniste E. General linguistics / E. Benveniste. – M.: Progress, 1974. 
6. Vezhbitskaya A. Language. Culture. Cognition [Text] / A. Vezhbitskaya. - M .: Russian dictionaries, 1997. 
7. Galperin I.R. Text as an object of linguistic research [Text] / I.R. Galperin. - M.: Nauka, 1981 
8. Druzina N.V. Fundamental verbs of being and having. Functional and cognitive aspects [Text]: dis. …d. philol. Sciences. - 
Saratov, 2005. - 352 p. 
9. Karasik V.I. Estimated dominants in the language picture of the world / V.I. Karasik // Unity of Systemic and Functional 
Analysis of Language Units. - Belgorod, 1999. - S. 39 - 40. 
10. Kubryakova E.S. et al. Brief Dictionary of Cognitive Terms / E.S. Kubryakova. - M.: Enlightenment, 1996. - 245 p. 
11. Maslova V.A. Linguoculturology / V.A. Maslova. - M .: Publishing Center "Academy", 2004. - 208 p. 



Download 1.91 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   ...   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   ...   211




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling