Conduct of modern science– 2016 • Díl 1

Salimov Bahriddin Lutfullaevich 
Tashkent Institute of Railway Engineering 
Associate professor of the department of “Social Humanities” 
Doktor of fhilosophy (Ph.d)
 
Annotation 
This article cites and substantiates from a scientific point of view the views of one 
of the representatives of the German classical philosophy of Hegel that the dialectic of 
chance (chance) and necessity cannot exist without each other, and contrasting them 
with each other is completely meaningless. At the same time, as indicated in the article, 
the views of the Danish philosopher S.Kierkegaard also gave a peculiar interpretation 
of the phenomenon of chance. The peculiarity of the ideas of S.Kierkegaard is that in 
his philosophy there is no single opinion, opinion about the case, chance.
Keywords: Necessity, chance (accident), dialectic, phenomenon, possibility, 
reality, reason, basis, riddle, criticism, recognition, attitude, abstractness, existence, 
contradiction. 
Scientific awareness (study) of the phenomenon of chance in the new period 
marked the beginning of the classical German philosopher Georg Hegel. In the study 
of the case, Hegel was far ahead of his predecessors. Hegel was the first philosopher to 
prove that two dialectics — the dialectic of chance and the dialectic of necessity — 
cannot exist without each other, and their opposition is absolutely pointless. "It is 
interesting," writes Hegel, "who guessed the case of opposing the need, and by the way, 
where the case is, there is the need"[1, 27]. With this thought, the German philosopher 
promotes the idea that in any random event there is a need, or all random phenomena 
arise according to a certain need. However, Hegel argues that the case sometimes 

---

Бъдещите изследвания - 2020 ★ Volume 10 
74 
determines the need. According to his theory, the manifestation of necessity is 
connected with the case and the basis of any need, from any side, is the case. In this 
case, if Hegel, under all things, meant this existing reality, what is in reality (exists), 
then by opportunity he, by all appearances, understands the same existing reality or the 
available choice when moving or turning into reality all that exists. It should be noted, 
the transformation of any of these possibilities - this is exactly the case.
However, secondly, the case is that it happened is a reality, i.e. it has a possibility 
for this, or actually and objectively exists; everything is just like that, or maybe just 
like that, there is a possibility and certainty to it. On the contrary, he (case) has an 
opinion about his own true spiritual (psychological) state and he (case), in other words, 
has a different basis”[2, 197].
From the above, i.e. based on the ideas and expressions of Hegel, we can conclude: 
randomness has no basis; the reason for this is that it is random. But at the same time, 
chance is solid. This is because it is accidental. An accident that becomes true. Carried 
out, is the future result of something or any phenomenon. 
The solidity of the case, i.e. that it has a foundation and cannot arise from nothing 
in that, when studying any random event, you can see that there is a reason, i.e. the 
basis for its appearance. Speaking in other words, it will be possible to find out, to 
understand the causes, the peculiarities of the happened phenomenon. The 
groundlessness of the case (accident) lies, in our opinion, in the fact that the reasons 
for the origin of this case, its true essence remains unknown. People do not understand, 
do not find out until the end of the reasons, the peculiarities of the event and in the 
future this is repeated again. In the views of the Danish philosopher S.Kerkegaard, 
who played a major role in creating the philosophy of existentialism, the phenomenon 
of chance is interpreted in a peculiar way. The peculiarity of the views of this 
philosopher is that in his philosophy there is no single, firm opinion about this 
phenomenon. S. Kierkegaard sometimes praises the case, sometimes criticizes him. 
However, surprised by the complexity of the case, the impossibility of his knowledge, 
S.Kierkegaard eventually changes his view of this phenomenon to a serious and 

---