98
D E V E L O P M E N T
even though there is no dispute about the existence of two tenses for English, the
choice of their names, ‘present’ and ‘past’ may be somewhat unfortunate, because
they reinforce this ‘tense = time’ fallacy. Indeed, some grammarians do not use
these terms. And when we think about it, dividing the whole of human experience
into two basic time options, present and past, would be very limiting. What about
experiences that cross this division? Since every clause in English must have a verb,
and since every verb must have one of these two forms (with limited exceptions),
surely we should expect them to be flexible in their relationship to time. This is, in
fact, what happens.
What follows is a relatively brief account of the tenses and their relationship to
time and other factors.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: