Of the republic of uzbekistan tashkent state pedagogical university named after nizami

2.2. Expressing agreement and disagreement as the means of intercultural communication. ( Agreement and disagreement :A cross cultural comparison)
Agreeing and disagreeing are a integral phase of collaboration. Learning how to do it effectively except offending each person receives more hard when you are interacting across cultures. We'll look at the cultural differences that will help you navigate multicultural situations.
Have you observed that some human beings experience very uncomfortable confronting other human beings while others feel definitely best overtly announcing they disagree? Apart from personal differences, it might also be influenced by means of the culture they grew up with. In this section, we will seem to be at some cultural variations and share some easy-to-apply suggestions to navigate every day expert situations.
As Erin Meyer very well outlines in her book The Culture Map, some cultures are more comfortable with disagreeing than others.[13,48]



In confrontational cultures, discovering the truth or the excellent solution feasible is the priority. In these cultures. disagreement and debate are regarded advantageous for the team and will no longer negatively have an effect on the relationship. These cultures are comfortably openly pronouncing “I totally disagree”. Some of the most confrontational cultures are Israel, France, Germany, Russia, and the Netherlands. In Germany, for example, they have the phrase Sachlichkeit, which refers to objectivity or functionalism. They are taught to separate someone's opinion from the character expressing the idea.
In other cultures where confrontation is avoided, they prioritize crew harmony. In these cultures, disagreement and debate are viewed negative for the group. It is inappropriate to openly disagree with any individual and it would possibly also in addition moreover poor have an influence on the relationship. Indonesia, Japan, Thailand, Ghana, or China are some examples. In these cultures, defending any other person's face is giant quintessential than declaring what you be given as desirable with is correct. For example:
Germans disagree openly, considering it to be the most truthful way. Americans and Finns are additionally admirably frank and direct. French humans disagree openly, but politely. In the East Asian cultures, open disagreement is taboo—indeed most Asians are apprehensive about it. British people additionally dislike open hostilities and use quite a number situations of coded speech to soften their opposition in conversation.
The examples underneath thing out how strategies of expressing disagreement may additionally moreover be affected through way of Swedish love of consensus, Chinese fondness for ambiguity, Italian indirectness, Japanese subject about loss of face, American cynicism, Swiss correctness, Filipino deference to superiors, Brazilian cheerfulness, and Finnish humorous reticence.[26,79-85]
I don’t agree (German)
I’m afraid I don’t share your opinion (French)
I agree, up to a point (British)
Let’s agree to disagree (British)
We agree (Japanese)
We agree if all of us agree (Swedish)
We agree and disagree at the same time (Chinese)
Have another cup of coffee (Finnish)
I agree with you, but I don’t think my board of directors will (Swiss)
You gotta be kidding (US)
You are the boss (Filipino)
I suppose anything’s possible (Brazilian)
Let’s go and have a Campari and talk about it tomorrow (Italian)
In Expert , Speaker H is a Chinese college student and Speaker XF is an American college student. They discussed Shakespeare's works. Speaker H believed that Shakespeare's works are difficult to read. Speaker XF replied: “I agree with you, Shakespeare is hard to read.” Then he added: “but almost half of my college professors told us we have to know him and his productions.” In this response, Speaker XF first agreed with Speaker H's viewpoints, but then he told Speaker H that more than half of the professors in his college require students to read Shakespeare's works, which implies that they should read, though difficult. This view is inconsistent with what Speaker H holds. Therefore, American student Speaker XF used implicit disagreement as US students are confrontational . In implicit disagreement, interlocutors can also express their partial agreement with the recipients before declaring their total disagreement no to effect negatively . Commonly used sentence patterns are like “I agree with you, but...”, “I partially agree with you, but...”, etc. Chinese have a roundabout phenomenon when they speak — they do not directly cut into the theme. Instead, they first say something that has nothing to do with the theme, such as greetings, inquiries, etc., and then tell the true purpose of their communication. This method is used more often, especially when rejecting, requesting, or expressing a different opinion from others. In the etiquette culture of the United States, the first thing to do is to be polite. Americans have developed a habit of being polite when they are young. In their everyday life, even if they talk to their parents, brothers and sisters, they will use “thank you”, “please”, “sorry” and so on. They believe that everyone is equal and respectable. Men must have a gentlemanlike manner and women must have aristocratic temperament, which is an important manifestation of personal cultivation.[25,205-206]
These frameworks and suggestions can be very really useful to navigate multicultural environments. However, no longer all Western and Eastern cultures are the same, and now not every individual inside those cultures will behave the equal way. The continuum confrontational - avoid confrontation is a device to observe cultures. For example, compared to Japan, human beings from the U.S. are confrontational, however in contrast with Germans, Americans maintain away from confrontation.[13,920]
There are Quick hints to disagree for people who are from a confrontational culture If you're from a as a substitute confrontational culture, like Germany, France, Russia, Netherlands, Denmark, or Italy, and you want to cooperate with human beings from more reserved cultures, here are some speedy tips:
-Don’t look people or force them to speak up
-Find ways to brainstorm anonymously
-Have a assembly before the most important meeting
-Give people note to prep their ideas before the meeting
-Consider 1:1 meetings
-If you are the manager, reflect consideration on not participating in some brainstorming periods
Quick pointers to disagree if you're from a non-confrontational culture If you're from subculture that prefers to avoid disagreeing openly, such as Japan, India, Mexico, Sweden, China, or Saudi Arabia, and you are working with humans from greater confrontational cultures, you can observe these speedy tips:[40,25-36]
-Don’t take their confrontations personally
-Using a high-quality language might also make it less difficult for you to speak up and you will make certain it is well received via others
-Talk to your colleagues and supervisor about how you like to work (e.g. distribute agenda in advance)
Expressions of agreement in intercultural communication can vary significantly depending on the cultural background of the communicators. What may be considered an appropriate way of expressing agreement in one culture may not be appropriate or may even be interpreted as disagreement in another culture. Here are some examples of expressions of agreement in intercultural communication[27,95-111]: