Problems of phonostylistics

CONCLUSION
In the present course paper there has been made an attempt to analyze peculiarities of teaching different types of methods in the light of foreign language acquisition and English teaching methodology.
On the basis of the material collected the following conclusions may be deduced:
Since its inception in the 1970s, communicative language teaching has passed through a number of different phases. In its first phase, a primary concern was the need to develop a syllabus and teaching approach that was compatible with carly conceptions of communicative competence. This led to proposals for the organization of syllabuses in terms of functions and notions rather than grammatical structures. Later the focus shifted to procedures for identifying learners communicative necds and this resulted in proposals to make needs analysis an essential component of communicative methodology. At the same time, methodologists focused on the kinds of classroom activities that could be used to implement a communicative approach, such as group work, task work, and information-gap activities.
Today CLT can be seen as describing a set of core principles about language learning and teaching, as summarized above, assumptions which can be applied in different ways and which address different aspects of the processes of teaching and learning.
Some focus centrally on the input to the learning process. Thus content-based teaching stresses that the content or subject matter of teaching drives the whole language learning process. Some teaching proposals focus more directly on instructional processes. Task-based instruction for example, advocates the use of specially designed instructional tasks as the basis of learning. Others, such as competency-based instruction and text-bascd teaching,focus on the outcomes of learning and use outcomes or products as the starting point in planning teaching.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. N. Chomsky., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. (Boston: MIT Press, 1965, p. 3).
2. D. Hymes., On Communicative Competence, (Harmondworth: Penguin, 1972, p. 281).
3. M. A. K. Halliday., Learning How to Mean, Explorations in the Development of Language, (London: Edward Arnold, 1975, pp. 11-17).
4. J. C. Richards and T. S. Rodgers., Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, p. 71).
5. W. Littelwood., Foreign and Second Language Learning: Language Acquisition Research and its Implications for the Classroom, (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1984, p. 74). K. Morrow., English Language Teaching.
6. Historical Overview and Current Trends, ( n. p., 1981, p. 69).
7.M. Finocchiaro and C. Brumfit., The Functional-Notional Approach: From Theory to Practice, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983, pp. 91-93).
8. G. Nagraj., English Language Teaching: Approaches, Methods, Techniques, (Calcutta: Orient Longman Limited, 1996, p. 90).
9. K. Hussain., Translation and Mother Tongue in Language Teaching, (New Delhi: Brahmi Publications, 1996, p. 60).
10. W. Littlewood., Communicative Language Teaching, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, p. 24).
Internet sources:

1. 
   www.google.uz
   
2. 
   www.search.com
   
3. 
   www.vikipedia.com
   
4. 
   www.yandex.ru
   
5. 
   www.rambler.ru
   
6. 
   www.ozon.ru
   
7. 
   www.opera.com
   
8. 
   www.cambridge.com