Sector Assistance Program Evaluation on Education in Uzbekistan

DMFs as per RRP 
Project Name and 
Details 
Impact/Outcome/Output Performance 
Targets 
Progress/Status/Issues as per PPR
(as of 31 January 2010) 
 
 
- Poor targeting of project interventions 
- Lack of cooperation between implementing 
agencies 
 
SIF fund is operational and well structured. 
Despite government's repeated commitment, 
this area has yet to improve. This remains a 
difficulty in effective implementation. 

Key 
Assumptions/Risks 
(Input–Output) 
- Government’s will to build consensus on 
key policy issues / cooperative dialogue 
between government and nongovernment 
authorities / effective collaboration between 
MOPE, MOHSSE and other policymaking 
bodies 
 
- Access to (and reliability of) school and 
personnel statistics and data 
 
- Identification of qualified personnel for the 
DE structure / release of staff by MOPE to 
undergo training 
 
- Joint MOPE/MOHSSE effort to develop DE 
modules 
 
- Government’s 
timely 
funding of civil works 
 
 
 
 
- Adequate salary and compensation 
package for DE staff / module writers, and 
instructors 
 
- Collaboration between MOPE and mahalla 
authorities for the establishment of the SIF/ 
collaboration between SIF facilitators and 
school authorities 
 
- Commitment of central and local authorities 
to support the new financing legislation / 
decentralization 
 
 
 
Much more needs to be done for effective 
interagency coordination and cooperation. 
Committed. 
Personnel has been selected. 
Committed. 
Completed the rehabilitation of selected 
rooms at the Central Institute for Education 
Staff Development, of 14 regional in-service 
teacher training institutes, and 70 LRCs. 
To be addressed. 
Being complied with. 
Committed. 

---

Appe
ndix 
6
67