Tcrv ta 8799 ind supporting Public–Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development

Output 4 
PPP enabling 
frameworks and 
tools developed
 
4a. By 2019, the following 
relevant key PPP policy 
and/or analytical works 
developed: 
a. VGF study 
b. renegotiation of 
contracts 
c. green bond financing 
d. value for money 
analyses 
4a. Not achieved. Four 
studies were shortlisted in 
April 2019, but the 
activities could not be 
implemented within the 
remaining time. 
4a. The changes to this 
DMF indicator (the 
inclusion of four studies) 
were made during the 
memo extension in April 
2019. However, the 
TCR explained that a 
final decision on the 
terms of reference for 
the study and the 
identification of suitable 
experts could not be 
concluded within the 

---

12 
Attachments
INTERNAL. This information is accessible to ADB Management and staff. It may be shared outside ADB with appropriate permission. 
4b. By 2019, a national 
level PPP conference to 
discuss TA outputs and 
PPP policy framework. 
Exposure visits to 
Philippines (for advanced 
PPP projects and 
framework) and United 
Kingdom (for contract 
renegotiation) 
4c. By 2019, one PPP 
framework or toolkit 
developed for the assisted 
states, where required, 
with recommendations for 
enhancing PPP agenda 
based on the review of 
existing state institutional 
and regulatory PPP 
framework. 
4b. Partly achieved. 
There were no specific 
new capacity building 
needs assessments 
conducted but the 
State Administrative 
Training Institute, 
Government of 
Karnataka, availed of the 
PPP expert’s support for 
delivering PPP training 
modules such as the 
“Training program on 
PPPs for Government of 
Karnataka Officers” and 
the “Orientation Program 
for Officials from Smart 
City Special Purpose 
Vehicles in Karnataka” to 
more than 400 officials
.
4c. Partly Achieved. The 
PPP expert supported the 
Government of 
Karnataka’s PPP 
enabling framework 
development by (i) 
providing inputs on the 
institutional strengthening 
of PPP in the 
Infrastructure Bill, and the 
Institutional Framework 
for PPP with Omnibus 
Importance of 
Infrastructure Act; and (ii) 
reviewing the 
organizational chart of 
Karnataka State Industrial 
and Infrastructure 
Development 
Cooperation to 
strengthen the 
institutional framework for 
developing PPP projects. 
remaining time of TA 
implementation. 
4b. The TCR noted (under 
Efficiency) that the 
national conference and 
exposure visits were not 
conducted. Instead, the 
TA supported the delivery 
of training programs on 
PPPs, as well as provided 
inputs on the institutional 
framework development 
for developing PPP 
projects for the 
Government of 
Karnataka. 
The TCR did not 
elaborate further on the 
reasons for this.
4c. The TCR indicated 
this as partly achieved 
but did not elaborate on 
why the indicator was 
not fully achieved by 
project closure. 
ADB = Asian Development Bank, DEA = Department of Economic Affairs, DMF = design and monitoring framework, 
PPP = public-private partnership, TA = technical assistance, TCR = technical assistance completion report,
VGF = viability gap funding. 
Sources: Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2014. Technical Assistance to India for Supporting Public–Private 
Partnerships for Infrastructure Development. Manila; and ADB. 2021. Technical Assistance Completion Report: 
Supporting Public–Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development in India. Manila. 

---

Document Outline

• 1. Project Data
• 2. Design and Monitoring Framework and Results
• 3. Performance Assessment
• 4. SUSTAINABILITY
• Lessons Learned
• TCR Quality Assessment
• Attachments