Bunyod Kholiyorov

Table-3.20. 
The calculation of the results of the students of the Karshi engineering-
economics institute 
Groups 5 
scores 
“excellent” 
4 scores 
“good” 
3 scores 
“satisfactory” 
2 scores 
“unsatisfactory” 
Overall 
Scores 
85-100 
70-84 
55-69 
Less than 55 
Experimental 
group (m
i
) 
37 27 
26 
5 
Т=95 
Control group 
(n
j
) 
20 27 
30 
13 
N=90 
Total: 57 54 56 
18 185 
32
,
9
18
13
90
5
95
56
30
90
26
95
54
27
90
27
95
57
20
90
37
95
90
95
1
2
2
2
2
¸¸¹
·
¨¨©
§
˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜
˜
T
from this
кузатув
кр
Т
T
H

32
,
9
81
,
7
:
.
1
the hypothesis (happened) was accepted. 
The results of students of Gulistan State University were calculated (see table 
3.21): 
Table-3.21. 
Calculation of the results of the students of Gulistan State University 
98
,
8
14
9
70
5
70
37
25
90
12
70
33
13
70
20
70
56
23
70
33
70
70
70
1
2
2
2
2
¸¸¹
·
¨¨©
§
˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜
˜
T
From
кузатув
кр
Т
T
H

98
,
8
81
,
7
:
.
1
the hypothesis (happened) was accepted. 
The calculation of the results of mastering of the students of the Tashkent 
Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers was made (see 
Table 3.22): 
 
 
 
 
 
Groups 5 
scores 
“excellent” 
4 scores 
“good” 
3 scores 
“satisfactory” 
2 scores 
“unsatisfactory” 
Overall 
Scores 
85-100 
70-84 
55-69 
Less than 55 
Experimental 
group (m
i
) 
33 20 
12 
5 
Т=70 
Control group 
(n
j
) 
23 13 
25 
9 
N=70 
Total: 56 33 37 
14 140 

---

94 
Table-3.22. 
Calculation of the results of the students of the Tashkent Institute of 
Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers 
 
Groups 5 
scores 
“excellent” 
4 scores 
“good” 
3 scores 
“satisfactory” 
2 scores 
“unsatisfactory” 
Overall 
Scores 85-100 
70-84 55-69 55 дан кам 
Experimental 
group (m
i
) 
36 24 
14 
6 
Т=80 
Control group 
(n
j
) 
24 17 
26 
8 
N=75 
Total: 60 41 40 
14 155 
97
,
7
18
8
75
6
80
56
26
75
14
80
54
17
75
24
80
57
24
75
36
80
80
75
1
2
2
2
2
¸¸¹
·
¨¨©
§
˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜

˜
˜
T
from 
кузатув
кр
Т
T
H

97
,
7
81
,
7
:
.
1
the hypothesis (happened) was found to be true. 
Thus, by the end of the main stage of the experimental work, the 
effectiveness of the development of lexical competence of the students of the 
experimental groups in English began to be seen in a certain way. It was proved 
that the effectiveness of the result obtained at the final stage of the pedagogical 
experiment-test work is reasonable. The general ideas of the research were 
presented in the form of a dissertation. Dissertation material was discussed in 
various places with the participation of professors and pedagogues of higher 
educational institutions, experts, practicing professors, methodologists, heads of 
educational institutions. 
Field of agricultural education during research 
Teaching English to students was based on 5 stages in a modular system. 
The 5-level content based on this modular system was developed based on the 
study of science programs taught in the agricultural education curriculum. Based 
on the results of the needs analysis for learning a foreign language in accordance 
with the specialty, exercises that can be done by future agricultural specialists (can-
do statements) were created in English. It covers the social, professional and 
academic skills required in English. 
Accordingly, it is assumed that the modular system will have aspects of 
socialization and networking, entry into specialization, general safety rules, 
relations in the field of agro-industry, and agricultural development. With the help 
of systematic teaching implemented in this sequence, the learning objectives were 
achieved. 
The results of the research conducted in the experimental and control groups 
showed that the efficiency of learning of the students of the Karshi Institute of 
Engineering and Economics was 11.2 percent, Gulistan State University was 11.1 
percent, and the Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization 
Engineers was 10.9 percent. So, the research work has been proved to be effective. 

---

95